> There seems to be a use case for it still, otherwise > collections.namedtuple wouldn't be added to 2.6, right?
Perhaps; I'm not strongly opposed to keeping structseq. I'll work on making stat_result and struct_time regular fixed-size types, for 3.0. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
