M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > I don't really understand what all this has to do with per user > site-packages. > > Note that the motivation for having per user site-packages > was to: > > * address a common request by Python extension package users, > > * get rid off the hackery done by setuptools in order > to provide this. > > As such the PEP can also be seen as an effort to enable code > cleanup *before* adding e.g. pkg_resources to the stdlib.
I guess it's a typical case of "while you on it, can you fix the rest of the world, too?". People see that I invest a fair share of time into the PEP. So they hope I'm going to solve loosely connected issues, too. Personally I'm not going to solve every security issue with my PEP. I suggest that all the people, who were interested in security, come together and write another PEP. Christian _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
