""Martin v. Löwis"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |> If the ambiguity is that 'int' behaviour is unspecified for floats - is | > it naive to suggest we specify the behaviour? | | The concern is that whatever gets specified is arbitrary. There are many | ways how an int can be constructed from a float, so why is any such way | better than the others, and deserves to be the meaning of int()?
Decades of usage, in English, with the meaning it already has in Python.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
