M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> As you can see, Integers and floats fall into the same pymalloc size
> class. What's strange in Andrew's result is that both integers
> and floats use the same free list technique and fall into the same
> pymalloc size class, yet the results are different.
My take is not that PyMalloc is so much better in the float case, but
that the float freelist implementation is suboptimal (though exactly
why is subject for conjecture, given it's almost identical to the int
implementation).
> The only difference that's apparent is that small integers are
> shared, so depending on the data set used for the test, fewer
> calls to pymalloc or the free list are made.
My testing was done with millions of unique integers, so the small int
handling should be deep in the measurement noise.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..."
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (pref) | Snail: PO Box 370
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (alt) | Belconnen ACT 2616
Web: http://www.andymac.org/ | Australia
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
