Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > -On [20080218 13:38], Virgil Dupras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >Personally, I think that a bug tracker is a good place to keep RFE, > >not a PEP. I think that the PEP would tend to be cluttered with RFE > >nobody cares about forever. So the clutter can never be cleaned unless > >someone takes the responsibility to mercilessly remove them. > > A bug tracker is a much better way of registering such information. It also > can be easier referenced in the future since even though when it is closed, > the debate and other stuff will remain in the tracker's tickets for > posterity. :) > > PEP: -1 > tracker: +1
I agree. Then we can set some status/keyword when the subject of a RFE is accepted by core developers, saying "if someone proposes a patch, it has a chance to be reviewed and applied". It may incite occasional contributors to work on some of these tasks, confident that their work will not be thrown away in two seconds. -- Amaury Forgeot d'Arc _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com