Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 12:26 PM 3/10/2008 +0100, Armin Rigo wrote:
>> In general, "x.append" is interchangeable with "x.append" even if
>> "x.append is not x.append", so let's go for the least surprizing
>> behavior: "m1.im_self is m2.im_self and m1.im_func==m2.im_func".
>> Objection?
>
> Nope; that's exactly what I proposed at the end of the email quoted above.
+1 here - this is the behaviour I would expect if attempting to provide
a called-once-only guarantee for a callback list.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
