After reading all this, I really don't  believe that adding egg
support to the stdlib at this time is the right thing to do. I am
therefore rejecting the PEP.

I am hoping that someone will create a simpler bootstrap module that
is able to download a file of pure Python code and install it, perhaps
by running its setup.py, assuming that it only depends on distutils
(or other things previously installed). I will welcome such a module
into the stdlib. I'm not sure a PEP is even needed, though interested
parties are certainly welcome to write a PEP specifying the behavior
first. With 2.6 and 3.0 slated for release in September, there should
be enough time to get this done before then.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to