Neal Norwitz wrote:
> [changing to: and subject: ]
> 
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:58 PM, neal.norwitz
> >  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  >  Get this test to pass (UserList/UserDict no longer exist and caused a 
> > skip).
> >
> >  I think the automatic skip on ImportError is harmful.
> >
> >  We should add a helper function to test_support so that you can write
> >
> >  foobar = test_support.import_optional('foobar')
> >
> >  and it will skip the test if foobar cannot be imported; all other
> >  failing imports should cause the test to *fail*.
> >
> >  Any takers? This should be an easy two-part task.
> 
> This would be a great starter project for a new developer.
> http://bugs.python.org/issue2409
> Let me know if you could use some help.  Feel free to contact me on or off 
> list.
> 
> n

This is available in the form of four patches on
http://bugs.python.org/issue2409.  

The first adds test_support.optional_import, which I now see is the opposite of
Guido's suggestion (blame the dyslexia).  I actually prefer optional_import,
though, since it puts 'import' next to the imported name, but I can add a fix if
it's a problem.

The next two patches refactor the imports of test_{sunaudiodev,winreg}.py to
make the imports easier to work with in the new scheme.

The last patch fixes the stdlib tests to use optional_import at the spots where
I was getting ImportErrors on my box (x86 Linux).

Please test these on your boxes so we can discover all the ImportErrors before
the buildbots do.

Thanks,
Jeff Balogh
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to