Adam Olsen <rhamph <at> gmail.com> writes: > Can you try with a call to sched_yield(), rather than nanosleep()? It > should have the same benefit but without as much performance hit. > > If it works, but is still too much hit, try tuning the checkinterval > to see if you can find an acceptable throughput/responsiveness > balance. >
I tried that, and it had no effect whatsoever. I suppose it would make an effect on a single CPU or an otherwise heavily loaded SMP system but that's not the secnario we care about. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
