On 24/03/2008, Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 24/03/2008, Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As I understood it nobody has claimed 2to3 to be perfect either, but > > > that using 2to3 will also require you to test the code in both > > > environments, so I don't see how that is a difference. > > > > Do you not test the code you distribute under each version of Python > > that you (claim to) support, in any case? > > Yes I do. I don't think my text above was unclear on the issue or > could be misunderstood in this way. Your statement "using 2to3 will also require you to test the code in both environments" seemed to me to say that *not* having to use 2to3 would save you from doing this (as if this were either desirable, or your current practice). My apologies if I misread your comment. What *are* you trying to say, then? It seems that you're saying that using 2to3 doesn't make things any more complex, but that contradicts your previous argument. Paul. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
