Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> I'm okay with bytearray not being subclassable in 2.6 as a temporary
> measure. I wouldn't want that to leak into 3.0 though, and I'd rather
> have it subclassable in 2.6 as well. I wonder why it doesn't work in
> 2.6 but does work in 3.0?
This fix for the issue was easy once I noticed the cause of the problem
Modified: python/branches/trunk-bytearray/Objects/typeobject.c
==============================================================================
--- python/branches/trunk-bytearray/Objects/typeobject.c (original)
+++ python/branches/trunk-bytearray/Objects/typeobject.c Wed Mar 26
13:20:46 2008
@@ -3762,6 +3762,8 @@
COPYBUF(bf_getwritebuffer);
COPYBUF(bf_getsegcount);
COPYBUF(bf_getcharbuffer);
+ COPYBUF(bf_getbuffer);
+ COPYBUF(bf_releasebuffer);
}
basebase = base->tp_base;
Christian
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
