On Apr 16, 2008, at 5:15 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 03:34:44PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
>>> That's why I proposed <0, 1, ..., 9> for repr(range(10)).
>>
>> My worry is that this will lead a newcomer into thinking
>> this is some kind of valid expression syntax.
>
> What about the less confusing and more readily generalizable:
>
> <range object 0, 1, ..., 9>
>
> It would also be helpful IMHO to use this kind of repr for most
> built-in
> iterators and iterables, instead of their mosty-useless default repr.
>
I think this is a great compromise. It is much more helpful to the
beginner than range(0,10). This would also be a very simple change to
the patch I already made :-)
I think it works nicely for the dict_keys, dict_values, and dict_items
objects also as the student will see:
<dict_items object ('a', 1), ('b', 2), ... >
This reinforces that they will be iterating over tuples, which is much
more helpful than a hexadecimal address.
Since ordering is not important for dictionary objects I wonder
whether the ending value(s) are even needed or whether the first two
are enough to help the student get an idea of what the object contains.
Brad
>
> A bientot,
>
> Armin.
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/bonelake%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
