Jesse Noller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Michael Foord > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Guido van Rossum wrote: >> > I'm worried that a mass renaming would do anything but inconvenience >> > users during the already stressful 2->3 transition. >> > >> > I'm more in favor of the original proposal of reducing the redundancy >> post-3.0. >> > >> > >> >> So nix the PEP-8'ifying until after 3.0. >> >> So new methods should follow the current naming scheme (assertIn, >> assertNotIn etc). >> >> [snip...] >> >> > > +1 on your changes Michael - I really like the decorator idea. Let me > know if you want help on adding the new stuff or updating the > documentation. What about aiming this at 2.6 instead of 3.0? > > -jesse > As they will just be new features rather than API changes I would like to add these to 2.6 - although I think May 10th may be after the last alpha?
Michael _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
