2008/5/1, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > There may be more implications and surprising behavior surrounding this. > > I know that the implementation is a compromise, but I'd rather see a > super() > whose full semantics can be explained to programmers without using to > "cell variable", "f_localsplus" and "symtable".
In consideration of what's been said about super() in the past, and what is handled here regarding its Py3 implementation, I want to make a step back, and ask: Has super() proved more useful than harmful? Which is the value for Py3 to keep it? Regards, -- . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
