On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Fred Drake schrieb: >>>>> >>>>> On May 10, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Works for me. The other thing I always use from cgi is escape() -- >>>>>> will that be available somewhere else too? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> xml.sax.saxutils.escape() would be an appropriate replacement, though the >>>>> location is a little funky. >>> >>> More than a little IMO. :-( >>> >> >> Well, if that function is better than who cares about the location; it >> will end up in urllib.parse as some function. > > It's a trivial function; it shouldn't pull in three packages and lots > of other cruft.
So are you saying that it isn't that much better in urllib.parse? That only cuts the package count down by one. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
