On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On a sunny day, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> For the sake of argument, let's consider the Queue module. It is now >> named queue. For 2.6 I plan on having both Queue and queue listed in >> the index, with Queue deprecated with instructions to use the new >> name. >> >> But what to do about all the references. Should we leave them pointing >> at Queue to lessen confusion for people who read about some module on >> some other site that isn't using the new name, or update everything in >> 2.6 to use the new name? > > I'd say use the new names, so people can get used to them sooner -- > otherwise all you do is postpone the confusion until they're going to > use 3.0. People who've only head of Queue will be fine as long as > searching for Queue in the index and TOC will find them a pointer to > queue (and that one has a "versionadded 2.6 -- renamed from Queue" > note). >
OK, documented as such. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
