Errata: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Alexandre Vassalotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And, one solution to this is to use Python 2.6 to regenerate pickle > stream.
... to regenerate *the* pickle *streams*. > It is surely not the most elegant or robust solution, but I could work. ... but *it* could work. > This would certainly work for simple modules, but what about packages? > For packages, you can't use the ``sys.modules[__name__] = Queue`` to > preserve module identity. ... you can't use the ``sys.modules[__name__] = Queue`` *trick* to preserve module identity. > A possible solution could be writing a compatibility layer for the ... could be *to write* a compatibility layer... I guess I should start proofreading my emails before sending them, not after... -- Alexandre _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
