> I guess we need first all buildbots updated to 4.7.25 before changing > the setup.py to support BDB 4.7, to avoid no updated ones linking > against (old) buggy 4.6 releases.
Why do you think so? Updating all buildbots is not feasible, atleast not within this year. Some machines *intentionally* stay at old software, just to make sure Python continues to build. Would pybsddb 4.7 continue to build with all bsddb releases that it currently builds with? > Reading the buildbot outputs, I see some machines using "ancient" BDB > versions. For example, "amd64 gentoo trunk" uses 4.4.x. Would be nice to > know the exact release :-). Feel free to temporarily commit code to make it find out - either directly in the trunk, or by making a temporary branch and have that branch be built on the particular slave only. > This is interesting, because a buildbot using a DBD < 4.7 will not > exercise the module at full capacity, so buildbot value is, somewhat, > reduced. That's a matter of standpoint. It also tests whether the module works and passes its test suite with older releases, which is a good thing. So it's more valuable to have old releases on some slaves, rather than having them test all the same version (which is known to work in principle, anyway). > I would hate to find problems in Python beta releases because the > buildbots are outdated :( Don't worry, some slaves will surely have the latest version, at some point (if none else, the Windows ones will). Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com