On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 6:31 PM, r.m.oudkerk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 31/05/2008, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/5/30 Farshid Lashkari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> I'm not sure if there will be any side affects to modifying >>> sys.executable though. Should this be the official way of supporting >>> embedded interpreters or should there be a >>> multiprocessing.setExecutable() method? >> >> +1 for setExecutable (I'd prefer set_executable, to be PEP 8 >> compliant). Make it explicit, rather than fiddling with stuff in sys >> manually. > > That is easy to do.
Also note - someone just pointed out to me that the executable manipulation as-is breaks when you execute things within IDLE. I'll add all of this to the PEP. -jesse _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
