On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Also - we could leave in stubs to match the threading api - Guido, David >> Goodger and others really prefer not to continue the "broken" API of the >> threading API > I agree that the threading the the pyprocessing APIs should be PEP 8 > compliant, but I think 2 APIs is almost worse than one wrong one. >
I disagree. If you state upfront that one of them is only for backwards-compatibility/transitioning and will be going away in the future, then I think it is fine to have the extra API. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
