On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Leif Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't been following this thread very closely, so I'm not sure > what the status is, but I'd just like to point out that yesterday I > used the fact that a[None] = b works, when I used the @memoize > decorator from the wiki. This seems to provide an argument that, for > symmetry's sake, we might want to keep a.None = b as well.
That makes about as much sense as wanting to support a.42 = b since a[42] = b works. :-) -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com