Benjamin Peterson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm personally fine with that approach, but some of the new items in there
for 2.6 could probably use a bit of cleaning up to improve the APIs and/or
the way they work.
So get crackin'!
I'll add to my list. :)
Anyway, if we are going to make test.support public for real why don't
we take Nick's suggestion to rename the test package to _test, but
move test.support to a toplevel position like testutils or such.
Leaving the actual test modules undocumented (which is the situation
now) is fine in my opinion. The _test idea was just for if we wanted to
document test_support for our own benefit without promising to keep it
stable for later releases.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
