eyal.lotem+pyutils <at> gmail.com <eyal.lotem <at> gmail.com> writes: > > That would be no worse than what happens now - but its still not > perfect (__del__ ordering issues). Also, you would need to temporarily > revive the cycles as mentioned above (to avoid accessibility of > partially destructed objects).
The idea is to call all __del__'s *before* any object in the cycle is deallocated (that is, call them manually rather than as part of deallocating them). That way you shouldn't have the issues mentioned above. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
