Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney wrote: > > "Benjamin Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Line 94-95 in unittest.py (trunk): > >> # All classes defined herein are 'new-style' classes, allowing use of > >> 'super()' > >> __metaclass__ = type > > > > Hmm, you're right; I see that in Python 2.5.2 'unittest.py'. > > > > Why is it not there in 3.0's 'unittest.py'? Is this achieved some > > other way? > > In 3.0 there are only new-style classes, so nothing needs to be done > there.
What makes that happen in the case where a class declares no superclass? Is there an invisible enforced "__metaclass__ = type" for every module? Where can I read about this change? -- \ “The apparent lesson of the Inquisition is that insistence on | `\ uniformity of belief is fatal to intellectual, moral, and | _o__) spiritual health.” —_The Uses Of The Past_, Herbert J. Muller | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
