"Steven D'Aprano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:26:45 am Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > From: "Ben Finney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Right, so I'm putting up a separate PEP just for the renaming. > > > Should be arriving on this list soon. > > > > I would like to work with you or someone else who is interested > > on an alternative PEP for a separate, simpler test module > > using the py.test syntax. > > I am interested in this suggestion. I didn't know about py.test. > > I admit to dissatisfaction with unittest (too Java-ish and heavyweight > for my tastes). I would love a test suite midway in weight between > doctests and unittest, so I will check it out.
I still think 'nose' is a better candidate for this: it appears to offer what people say they want from 'py.test', yet (unlike 'py.test') is integrated well with 'unittest'. -- \ “Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “I think so, | `\ Brain, but what kind of rides do they have in Fabioland?” | _o__) —_Pinky and The Brain_ | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
