Fernando Perez wrote: re http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0225/
I am hereby volunteering to try to organize a BOF session at the conference on this topic, and can come back later with the summary. I'm also scheduled to give a talk at BayPiggies on Numpy/Scipy soon after the conference, so that may be a good opportunity to have some further discussions in person with some of you.
...
So if this idea sounds agreeable to python-dev, I'd need to know whether I should propose the BOF using pep 225 as a starting point, or if there are any other considerations on the matter I should be aware of (I've read this thread in full, but I just want to start on track since the BOF is a one-shot event). I'll obviously post this on the numpy/scipy mailing lists so those not coming to the conference can participate, but an all-hands BOF is an excellent opportunity to collect feedback and ideas from the community that is likely to care most about this feature.
When I read this some years ago, I was impressed by the unifying concept of operations on elements versus objects. And rereading, I plan to use the concept in writing about computation with Python. But implementing even half of the total examples with operator syntax rather than functions seemed a bit revolutionary and heavy. I am not sure I would want the number of __special__ methods nearly doubled. On the other hand, there is something to be said for orthogonality.
That said, I am curious what working scientists using Python think. tjr _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
