-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 25, 2008, at 1:53 PM, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Barry Warsaw wrote:
I agree. This seriously feels like new, potentially high risk code
to be adding this late in the game. The BDFL can always override,
but unless someone is really convincing that this is low risk high
benefit, I'd vote no for 2.6/3.0.
at least two Unicode experts have stated that they don't think the
changes are that important. determining exactly what the changes to
the *core* character database was the whole point of my offer to
tinker with this.
You don't mean the experts claimed they weren't important, right?
Unimportant changes definitely don't need to go in now <wink>.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSLMCSHEjvBPtnXfVAQKgLwP/YlrqcdlmoeBsK9JdJMnxkgN92L1K86cg
lzvQT6bv8vda64Su8bV81UT+NdoB+/ZGpZ1t+Dn4Z0uvB0uaVrZZ7uOUoqQTkvG7
yrj/Clbedi2v35vYjudqAaZyBnJtz+V0rH8tdgpDVU5zILSK4gQm385nFuoUXQpC
iJlqok3tjuU=
=YfQR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
