> So, er, is this a remotely sane thing to be doing, and does anyone have > suggestions? :)
Not for 2.6/3.0 - but after that: sounds good. OTOH, I don't see a clear technical *need* for these data to be const. In general, const-ness helps correctness and sharing across processes, and the cases you provide are correct and provide sharing even without being const. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
