On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 16:21, Scott Dial <[email protected]> wrote: > See the following email for a summary of existing practice (as of 2004): > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg27352.html
Interesting. Quite a lot of them do just drop the undecodable filenames. The Java solution with replacing it seems to be a better idea at first glance, but what if you then end up with two filenames that are the same? Possibly replacing with the <?> character is a good idea to notify that the file is there, but fail then fail to open it. -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
