On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 16:21, Scott Dial
<scott+python-...@scottdial.com> wrote:
> See the following email for a summary of existing practice (as of 2004):
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/unic...@unicode.org/msg27352.html

Interesting. Quite a lot of them do just drop the undecodable
filenames. The Java solution with replacing it seems to be a better
idea at first glance, but what if you then end up with two filenames
that are the same? Possibly replacing with the <?> character is a good
idea to notify that the file is there, but fail then fail to open it.

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting.
http://www.colliberty.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to