Hi all, I'm new here, so bear with me. I tried googling this, but the closest I came up with was a post from 2000.
>From the discussion about getting rid of the GIL lately, what I read from it is that reference counting is the main obstacle. My question is, why aren't hardware supported atomic increments and decrements being used for the reference counters? As far as I'm told they are available on most modern platforms (on x86 it is the LOCK instruction prefix) and these incur little overhead. I'd be very happy with pointers to previous discussion on the matter or simple arguments why this would not apply to the Python reference counting mechanism. cheers, Arnar _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
