Nick Coghlan wrote: > Rather than playing whack-a-mole with this, does anyone have any ideas > on how to systematically find types which are defined in the core, but > are missing an explicit PyType_Ready call? (I guess one way would be to > remove all the implicit calls in a local build and see what blows up... > that seems a little drastic though)
The whack-a-mole tactic did pick up a couple more though - the two "builtin" types that iter() can return (the basic sequence iterator and the callable with sentinel result iterator). Perhaps the path of least resistance is to change PyObject_Hash to be yet another place where PyType_Ready will be called implicitly if it hasn't been called already? That approach would get us back to the Python 2.x status quo where calling PyType_Ready was only absolutely essential if you wanted to correctly inherit a slot from a type other than object itself. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
