Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote: > Are you all certain that this mapping from a generator expression to > a foor loop isn't just a happy coincidence? After all, the generator > statement is just a generalization of the list comprehension and that > doesn't map quite so directly.
The mapping of the for and if clauses is identical for both generator expressions and the various flavours of comprehension. It's only the outer wrappings (creating a generator/dict/set/list) and the innermost loop body (yield statement/item assignment/set add/list append) that differ between the constructs. As Terry noted, it's even defined that way in the language reference - the expressions are pure syntactic sugar for the corresponding statements. While this doesn't often matter in practice (since people tend to switch to using the statement based versions rather than writing convoluted multiple clause comprehensions), it's still an important symmetry that matters greatly to Python VM implementers so any proposed changes need to take it into account. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
