-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 25, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Jared Grubb wrote:
Regardless of the outcome, those that want to use SVN can use SVN, and those that want to use "chosen DVCS" can use that. In the end, which is the more "lossy" repository? It seems like if the change is transparent to everyone who is using it, then the only thing that we care about is that the chosen backend will preserve all the information to make it truly transparent to everyone involved.
svn is the more lossy repository format. Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSX5vZnEjvBPtnXfVAQJzcgP/SweUwXoECPJpO5BEkmdTLDoEfPP1X1Lg m4AALSFZ3cfRUPX3UgGmT7anY604o5oaElFR8b0HkIScJvhF56nzs9oAR0Yqi8jN zThG1rizDHh+RSqUZ0yXKHVF6ScNf8aRg/cLoVtV+J6KGpYtTCSGTQWGnvSQxCj9 I+BY75DHOI8= =9A3a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
