On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 9:28 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote:
> tp_reserved sounds fine. In 3.0.1, filling it with a function pointer > should give no error, since that would be a binary-incompatible change. I'm not sure I understand you here. Are you saying that in your opinion it is safe to change the type of tp_reserved from (cmpfunc *) to some other (dummy) function pointer? I now realize (thanks to your message) that changing the type to (void *) isn't entirely safe, since sizeof(void*) may be different from sizeof(cmpfunc*) on some platforms. Mark _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
