Andrew Bennetts wrote:
A patch to add operator.caller(*args, **kwargs) may be a good idea. Your
example would then be:
map(operator.caller(), lst)
Regarding the name, note that I proposed operator.call (and
operator.__call__) because it corresponds to the __call__ special
method, which is analogous to how operator.neg corresponds to __neg__,
operator.add to __add__, etc. The term "caller" implies creation of a
new object that carries additional state, such as method name in
operator.methodcaller, item in operator.itemgetter, or attr in
operator.attrgetter.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com