Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 16:45, Daniel (ajax) Diniz <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > Reproduction really is the same thing as providing a test. > > That was where I got confused: many issues are easy to reproduce > ('test'), but need some thinking to get automated tests right. > > urllib always feels like this to me, except 'thinking' -> 'getting > lost over and over'. Reading 'test needed' as 'automated test needed', > things make a lot of sense. I have to test my patch against a good > representation of the issue, regression tests must pass, 'automated > test needed' fits well :) > > > Go with "Unit test needed" so it's short and to the point and you have a > deal. =) > Can I just say (without in any way wanting to get involved in what might be considered as "work") that it's encouraging the tracker received a bit more TLC we might eventually be able to see at least the occasional week where the issue count increment was negative :)
So thanks to everyone who's taking the time to deal with this low-profile not-very-glamorous issue. I, for one, appreciate it. regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
