On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <turnb...@sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: > On Python-Ideas, Guido van Rossum writes: > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Greg Ewing wrote: > > > > Fifth draft of the PEP. Re-worded a few things slightly > > > to hopefully make the proposal a bit clearer up front. > > > > Wow, how I long for the days when we routinely put things like this > > under revision control so its easy to compare versions. > > FWIW, Google Docs is almost there. Working with Brett et al on early > drafts of PEP 0374 was easy and pleasant, and Google Docs gives > control of access to the document to the editor, not the Subversion > admin. The ability to make comments that are not visible to > non-editors was nice. Now that it's in Subversion it's much less > convenient for me (a non-committer). I actually have to *decide* to > work on it, rather than simply raising a browser window, hitting > "refresh" and fixing a typo or two (then back to "day job" work). > > The main problem with Google Docs is that is records a revision > automatically every so often (good) but doesn't prune the automatic > commits (possibly hard to do efficiently) OR mark user saves specially > (easy to do). This lack of marking "important" revisions makes the > diff functionality kind of tedious. > > I don't know how automatic the conversion to reST was, but the PEP in > Subversion is a quite accurate conversion of the Google Doc version. > > Overall, I recommend use of Google Docs for "Python-Ideas" level of > PEP drafts.
Rietveld would also be a good option: it offers more at-will revision control (rather than "whenever Google Docs decides"), allows you to attach comments to the revisions, and will give you nice diffs between PEP iterations. Collin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
