On 02/03/2009 22:28, Georg Brandl wrote:
We're already quite inconsistent with type name casing in the collections module, so it wouldn't matter so much. (Though I'd find symmetry with defaultdict pleasing as well.)
Since the odict naming is already so prevalent in the wild, it seems to me like that would be the best candidate. (Plus, it's shorter!)
/bikeshedding Cheers, Dirkjan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
