Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment:

So all Chris has to do to get this applied to 2.5 is craft an exploit based
on the current behavior, right? ;-)

Right :-) Of course, security patches should see a much more careful
review than regular bug fixes.

Well, it's funny you say that, since where I bumped into this, the bug was effectively DOS'ing a couple of mailservers as a result of mailinglogger sending out log entries of uncaught exceptions such as this and so emitting 100Mb emails whenever the foreign server chose not to deliver the whole chunk requested...

That aside, is it actually a python-wide policy to *forbid* patching older releases where the patch isn't security-related?

I can understand the "no more releases unless there are security problems", but what's the harm in applying a patch to an old version branch on the off chance that a security release might be made some time?

cheers,

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
           - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to