Martin v. Löwis wrote:
In light of this, what I'd love to see (but sadly can't really help
with, and am not optimistic about happening) is for:

- python to grow a decent, cross platform, package management system

- the standard library to actually shrink to a point where only
libraries that are not released elsewhere are included

I'd be interested to know how many users of python also felt this way ;-)

I don't like the standard library to shrink. It's good that batteries
are included.
I have mixed feelings. It is great that the batteries are included, but some batteries are showing their age or not maintained (who maintains IDLE? - does the calendar module really warrant being in the standard library? - imaplib is really not useful and IMAPClient which isn't in the standard library is much better [1]).

If a library is well maintained then there seems to be little point in moving it into the standard library as it may actually be harder to maintain, and if a library has no active developers then do we really want it in the standard library...

On the other hand there are some standard tools that a significant portion of the community use (Python Imaging Library and the PyWin32 extensions for example) that aren't in the standard library.

I think other developers have similar mixed feelings, or at least there are enough people on both sides of the fence that it is very hard to make changes. Perhaps this is the way it should be.

Michael

[1] http://freshfoo.com/wiki/CodeIndex

Regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk


--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog


_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to