Dan Mahn <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that was a good idea. I found some problems, and attached a new > version. It looks more complicated than I wanted, but it is a very > regular repetition, so I hope it is generally readable.
That's great, but I was hoping for more tests in lib/test/test_urllib.py. Bill _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
