> Maybe it would make more sense for "synced" to force fsync() on each > flush, not only on close. I'm not sure how useful it is, but that's > what "synced" would imply to me.
That should be implement by passing O_SYNC on open, rather than explicitly calling fsync. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
