Tim Golden wrote: > Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> Can I ask which flavour of Sphinx is being used to build the py3k docs? >> >> The proper procedure to build the documentation is >> >> make update >> make htmlhelp #say > > > I think you misunderstood my question. I can build the docs > for 2.x, say -- have done so, in fact many times. I was simply trying to > use Python 3.x itself > to build the docs for Python 3.x, not realising at first > that Sphinx (and docutils, Jinja etc.) won't actually > run under 3.x. > Of course, as I later realised, I can just build them with > an existing 2.x install. I think I was sort of hoping to > have it produce its own dogfood, so to speak :)
I still think my answer would have helped. It says that a) you don't need to pull any other magic sphinx version from somewhere; the one that the Makefile fetches works just fine, and b) it uses "python" from the PATH; *not* the ../python which you just built. c) build.bat cannot be trusted to work (as you have found) Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
