2009/3/17 Raymond Hettinger <pyt...@rcn.com>: > Does anyone think it was not a good idea to put in-place operations in the > operator module? For some objects, they don't map() as well as their > regular counterparts. Some in-place operations rely on the interpreter to > take care of the actual assignment. I've not yet seen good use cases for > operator.isub() for example.
I thought the point of the operator module (unlike most modules) was to provide a comprehensive set of Python operators as functions for consistency even if there usefulness was questionable. -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
