On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 18:49, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com>wrote:
> Instead of looking at a bunch of issues last week the way I'd originally > intended, I wound up doing a review of a particular patch submission, > issue 2170. This is a refactoring of the 'normalize' method of > xml.dom.minidom. I wound up redoing the patch with a different > refactoring after finding out that the submitted patch was slower than > the original code. The revised patch is faster than the original code > (completes in 1/2 the time of the original code when run on a decent > sized document that needed no normalization done). > > I think the issue stage should be set to 'patch review', as in, it is ready > for developer review. The author of the original patch has reviewed my > revised patch and concurs. The patch includes additional tests. > I have set the stage. > > Now that I've learned more about how the tracker is organized, and read > the most-helpful http://www.python.org/dev/workflow/ document, I would > be happy to go through and triage issues for which that hasn't yet been > done, if I can be given permission to do so. Done! -Brett
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
