Nick Coghlan wrote: > With those two ideas combined, the PEP's "yield from" expansion could > then look like: > > for x in EXPR: > _v = yield x > if _v is not None: > continue _v > else _r: > RESULT = _r
Oops, got a little carried away there. Obviously, that doesn't handle thrown in exceptions the way "yield from" is intended to. So even with an adjusted for loop the full semantic expansion of 'yield from' would still need to be defined directly in terms of try/except and method calls on the underlying iterator to get the desired exception handling characteristics. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
