Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > "Batteries included" > is the status quo for the (C) Python project, and I personally don't > see a strong reason to change that policy until those who favor a > package-manager-based solution have a package manager that satisfies > them!
Beautifully put :) And a package based solution that satisfies everyone (or even a significant majority), be they on Windows, OS X, .deb based Linux, .rpm based Linux, some other Linux or *nix, be they a mere user or the machine admin... I think that's a problem that still has a lot of development work in front of it ;) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
