On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Jack diederich <jackd...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:50 PM, <s...@pobox.com> wrote: >> Barry> Someone asked me at Pycon about stripping out Demos and Tools. >> >> Matthias> +1, but please for 2.7 and 3.1 only. >> >> Is there a list of other demos or tools which should be deleted? If >> possible the list should be publicized so that people can pick up external >> maintenance if desired. > > I liked Brett's (Georg's?) half joking idea at sprints. Just delete > each subdirectory in a separate commit and then wait to see what > people revert. > > -Jack
Jack brought up a good point - this discussion came up during the sprints, I believe Martin and others had some good arguments to keep *some* of the demo/... stuff, however I think we all agreed that it belongs somewhere else; possibly the documentation. As it is, the demo/... directory only exists in subversion - it's not installed anywhere. I really do think that most of the contents can either be deleted, or moved to the docs where it might be of more use for people in general. Random thought - what if we made a docs/demos directory, which contained sub directories ala Demo/... - and added a sphinx extension which would detect nested directories and zip them up during the build? This way, you could add a tag in the .rst for the module that looked like: .. demos:: multiprocessing.zip The zip would not be checked in, but created at build time from Docs/demos/multiprocessing Just some thoughts. Back to my coffee. -jesse _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com