It would have helped if I'd copied the list... Sorry, Paul.
2009/4/7 Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com>: > 2009/4/7 Michael Foord <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk>: >> Mark Dickinson wrote: >>> >>> [snip...] >>> Discussion points >>> ================= >>> >>> (1) Any objections to including this into py3k? If there's >>> controversy, then I guess we'll need a PEP. >>> >> >> Big +1 >>> >>> (2) Should other Python implementations (Jython, >>> IronPython, etc.) be expected to use short float repr, or should >>> it just be considered an implementation detail of CPython? >>> I propose the latter, except that all implementations should >>> be required to satisfy eval(repr(x)) == x for finite floats x. >>> >> >> Short float repr should be an implementation detail, so long as >> eval(repr(x)) == x still holds. > > What he said :-) > Paul. > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
