On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:22 AM, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote:
>>>>> ip[0] >> >> '10.33.11.17' > > Actually I find that very intuitive if I understand that the objects > are always networks. I suspect the authors would disagree with you on this point, since they insist that host routes and host addresses are the same thing, but assuming you are right, two flaws are immediately apparent: * The ipaddr classes are poorly named. Since they model networks, they should be named appropriately: IPNet or some such. * The ipaddr authors have overlooked IP addresses, which also deserve first-class treatment in any meaningful IP address library. It is called ipaddr, after all, and not ipnet. >>>>> ip.ip_ext >> >> '10.33.11.17' > > That's not intuitive :) No, nor is the rest of the library intuitive. This is one of the reasons I've called it "quirky". Clay _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
